Logo.jpg (28528 bytes)

Plate Glass Vrs Pyrex


 

For most amateur telescope makers Plate or Pyrex becomes an issue of personal preference as to which of the two materials to use as a mirror substrate. For the making of, and for general viewing, either of the two materials are adequate to make a functional mirror.

 With the new technologies available, Plate glass has gone through some quality changes that have greatly improved the structural make-up of the glass itself. Zero impurities, x-ray approved quality, temperature stability, and tensile strength required for building construction, are a few of the changes for the new generation Plate glass.

 The other main differences between Plate glass and Pyrex  is cost. Plate glass is generally cheaper to purchase  than Pyrex.  Pyrex is not an optical glass.  The manufacturer of this glass has verbally told me that you couldn’t bend this “stuff” if you put an ocean liner on it. I have seen several 45 + storey buildings in Montreal that was constructed with this Plate glass several years ago, with only a light metal channel holding these massive 40-foot sections together.  These buildings withstand wind, extreme temperature variations (-35’ to +40’ C) and show no signs of stress or fatigue. I, myself have not carried out any stress tests with this glass.

 Plate glass is always being improved upon, where as Pyrex glass has not changed since it was invented. The new plate glass can be purchased today with “zero defects/zero impurities, and completely free of defects with x-ray quality.

 Last January, 3 of us with borrowed ISO approved test equipment, and conducted Energy (heat) Transfer Tests on several mirrors for 6 hours at –35’C. We conducted tests on full thickness Pyrex mirrors, 1” thick Plate, and .75” thick Plate. The Pyrex mirrors never achieved the ambient temperature, always being 1’F to 1 ½’F warmer than the surrounding air. The Plate glass mirrors had the same problems, but only remained from ½’F to ¾’F above the outside air temperature. This internal heat comes to the centre of the mirror, and rises upward onto the  viewing surface of the mirror, creating a boundry layer of  warm air that acts as another coating on your mirror face. This is what we erroneously refer to as  heat currents in the tube. The thinner mirrors by themselves gave clearer viewing due to less energy stored in the mirrors.

 These findings were presented to our club at the January 2002 meeting, and immediately almost every Newtonian/Dob had a side mounted fan blowing air across the face of the mirror. All production telescopes 10” and larger now have cross blowing fans as part of the scope’s make-up. Removing that boundry layer of warm air, makes for unbelievable viewing.

 This has encouraged some of our Club members to make large sized telescopes using thin Plate glass mirrors. The Club President is making an 18” mirror, and Peter Pekurar is building a 25” Telescope with a 1” thick mirror.

Go to;  http://www.kitgear.com/25%20inch%20plans.htm   to see construction……Ken.       

 

   mail.gif (4196 bytes)peekr@golden.net

Home


 Copyright ©2002 Peekr Technologies